http://www.bjug.org/20050421.html Communication and Contribution Wed, 27 Aug 2008 23:32:32 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5 http://www.bjug.org/20050421.html#comment-40 Tue, 31 May 2005 13:13:19 +0000 http://www.bjug.org/20050421.html#comment-40 Password Password

]]> http://www.bjug.org/20050421.html#comment-29 Mon, 23 May 2005 03:03:24 +0000 http://www.bjug.org/20050421.html#comment-29 请问，为?么PDF文件说采用了加密形式。本来想看看各位前辈的?点，唉 请问，为?么PDF文件说采用了加密形式。本来想看看各位前辈的?点，唉

]]> http://www.bjug.org/20050421.html#comment-10 Wed, 13 Apr 2005 11:08:53 +0000 http://www.bjug.org/20050421.html#comment-10 几个小问?: 1. ?8页的GRAPS?不是GRASP(General Responsibility Assignment Software Patterns)的笔?? 2. 看起来您想?明Peter Coad的方法比传统的modain modeling方法更好? 我的理解传统的方法是Use case model -- Domain model -- interaction diagram -- design model 没有看出?Peter Coad的优势具体在?? 3.如果再在每个ppt的最后加上一些references或?resource，也许???更有帮助?? 谢谢? 几个小问?:
1. ?8页的GRAPS?不是GRASP(General Responsibility Assignment Software Patterns)的笔??
2. 看起来您想?明Peter Coad的方法比传统的modain modeling方法更好?
我的理解传统的方法是Use case model — Domain model — interaction diagram — design model
没有看出?Peter Coad的优势具体在??
3.如果再在每个ppt的最后加上一些references或?resource，也许???更有帮助??
谢谢?

]]>